<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketing Autopsy Blog &#187; marketers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/tag/marketers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com</link>
	<description>Successful Inbound Marketing in the New Media Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:17:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pointless Babble Is King: Twitter Study Almost Hits the Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/pointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/pointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuong Huynh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Network Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter study provides good insights into Twitter universe, analyzing everything from Twitter conversation to self promotion, from Twitter spams to news. A good first effort, but further refinements are need to really capture Twitter user behaviors.<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com">Marketing Autopsy Blog</a><br>
 &#169; 2009 Marketing Autopsy Blog.
<br/><br/><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/pointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark/">Pointless Babble Is King: Twitter Study Almost Hits the Mark</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketingautopsyblog.com%2Fsocial-media%2Fpointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketingautopsyblog.com%2Fsocial-media%2Fpointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark%2F&amp;source=cuonghuynh&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" title="Pointless Babble Is King: Twitter Study Almost Hits the Mark Photo" alt=" Pointless Babble Is King: Twitter Study Almost Hits the Mark" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Pear Analytics recently did a study on how people are using and consuming Twitter. The study took 2,000 random tweets from the public timeline in English and in the U.S. over a period of 2 weeks, from 11:00a to 5:00p (CST) and was posted by Ryan Kelly. While I applaud the effort and think they are on the right track on providing a super-value added study to the public and marketers, I wouldn&#8217;t call this a conclusive study. Ryan mentioned that they will update it regularly so that&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
<p>Here are the results of the study with the categories defined by Pear Analytics:</p>
<ul>
<li>Pointless babble 40.55%</li>
<li>Conversational 37.55%</li>
<li>Pass along value 8.70%</li>
<li>Self promotion 5.85%</li>
<li>Spam 3.75%</li>
<li>News 3.60%</li>
</ul>
<p>You can read about the details of the study yourself (link at end of this post.) Some of the most surprising results are the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Self promotion and spam are not as prominent as many have complained about.</li>
<li>News represents a very small amount of activities, despite recent media buzz.</li>
</ul>
<p>So it looks like issues that affect many people (like the Iran election and spams) that receive huge news coverage also tend to pump up public impressions about Twitter and exaggerate their real impacts. The real numbers seem to show that these are not much of a problem; you just think they&#8217;re big problems because they&#8217;re constantly in your face or they annoy you a lot. With more refinement (such as extended time of day included in the study) we may see an increase in these numbers.</p>
<p>I look at this study as work in progress with better updates to be expected. Here are a few issues I see that should be resolved to improve the study value in the future:</p>
<ul>
<li>Pointless babble is not necessarily a negative thing as its name may suggest. This category needs more refinements as this big group represents many important pieces of information, both to consumers and marketers. For the consumers and individuals, it is exactly the social aspect of <a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/category/marketing/social-network-marketing/" title='Social Network Marketing'>social networking</a>, and people will continue to socialize the way they want to. All you can do accept it and understand it, not control or eliminate it. And this social spaces and activities are exactly where marketers need to be to understand consumer behaviors.</li>
<li>The time periods of 11:00 am to 5:00 pm CST is too limited to really understand Twitter users in the U.S. It&#8217;s only 6 hours of each of the time zones. At a minimum I think the study should begin at 6:00 am to midnight for each time zone. As it is, it merely tracks only the lunch to early evening hours of east coast time (noon to 6:00 pm, entirely missing 12 hours of east coast tweets,) and includes only the mid morning to mid-afternoon hours of west coast time (9:00 am to 3:00 pm, again entirely missing 12 hours of west coast tweets in the morning, late afternoon and evenings.)</li>
</ul>
<p>See the original Pear Analytics post on &#8220;<a title="Twitter Study Reveals Interesting Results About Usage" href="http://www.pearanalytics.com/2009/twitter-study-reveals-interesting-results-about-usage/" target="_blank">Twitter Study Reveals Interesting Results About Usage</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com">Marketing Autopsy Blog</a><br>
 &#169; 2009 Marketing Autopsy Blog.
<br/><br/><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/pointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark/">Pointless Babble Is King: Twitter Study Almost Hits the Mark</a></p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/must-have-formula-for-business-social-media-advertising/" title="Must-Have Formula For Business Social Media Advertising (August 26, 2009)">Must-Have Formula For Business Social Media Advertising</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/blogging/corporate-blogging-minimum-must-have-elements-for-successful-strategy/" title="Corporate Blogging &#8211; Minimum Must-Have Elements For Successful Strategy (August 11, 2009)">Corporate Blogging &#8211; Minimum Must-Have Elements For Successful Strategy</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/special/ford-bloggers-involved-women-instant-buzz/" title="Ford Gets Bloggers Involved in &#8220;What Women Want&#8221; for Instant Buzz (July 30, 2009)">Ford Gets Bloggers Involved in &#8220;What Women Want&#8221; for Instant Buzz</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/social-network-marketing/creating-social-media-strategy-include-legal-team/" title="Creating a Social Media Strategy? Don&#8217;t Forget the Legal Team (July 22, 2009)">Creating a Social Media Strategy? Don&#8217;t Forget the Legal Team</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/marketing-basics-and-building-buzz/" title="Marketing Basics and Building Buzz &#8211; What About Integrity? (July 15, 2009)">Marketing Basics and Building Buzz &#8211; What About Integrity?</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/corporate-marketing/inbound-marketing-blogging-business/" title="How to Build a New Media Corporate Marketing Team (July 8, 2009)">How to Build a New Media Corporate Marketing Team</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/online-marketing/how-to-benefit-from-twitter-trending-topics/" title="How to Benefit from Twitter Trending Topics and Keep Your Marketing Integrity and Ethics Too (July 5, 2009)">How to Benefit from Twitter Trending Topics and Keep Your Marketing Integrity and Ethics Too</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/twitters-achilles-heels-its-biggest-challenge/" title="Twitter&#8217;s Achilles&#8217; Heels May Be Its Biggest Challenge (June 26, 2009)">Twitter&#8217;s Achilles&#8217; Heels May Be Its Biggest Challenge</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/customer-facing/marketing-and-customer-service-is-really-the-same/" title="Marketing and Customer Service Are Really One and the Same to Customers (June 23, 2009)">Marketing and Customer Service Are Really One and the Same to Customers</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/scaling-back-or-stepping-up-marketing-in-a-recession/" title="Scaling Back or Stepping Up Marketing in a Recession? Maybe It&#8217;s the Wrong Question (June 17, 2009)">Scaling Back or Stepping Up Marketing in a Recession? Maybe It&#8217;s the Wrong Question</a></li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/pointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing Basics and Building Buzz &#8211; What About Integrity?</title>
		<link>http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/marketing-basics-and-building-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/marketing-basics-and-building-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cuong Huynh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Facing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Network Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/?p=828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I may be guilty as the next guy who mentions MJ is his post. And maybe I am. But more importantly, if this post can stop a few marketers and help them think about what they do just for a little while, it's done its job.<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com">Marketing Autopsy Blog</a><br>
 &#169; 2009 Marketing Autopsy Blog.
<br/><br/><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/marketing-basics-and-building-buzz/">Marketing Basics and Building Buzz &#8211; What About Integrity?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketingautopsyblog.com%2Fmarketing%2Fmarketing-basics-and-building-buzz%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketingautopsyblog.com%2Fmarketing%2Fmarketing-basics-and-building-buzz%2F&amp;source=cuonghuynh&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" title="Marketing Basics and Building Buzz   What About Integrity? Photo" alt=" Marketing Basics and Building Buzz   What About Integrity?" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>We&#8217;ve all been bombarded with Michael Jackson&#8217;s news in the last few weeks. While many, fans and non-fans alike, were affected by his death in some way, MJ&#8217;s father went on the offensive to promote his new business venture just days after. In these modern days, I guess there are still salesmen so blinded by money that they sell their souls too. So now&#8217;s a good opportunity to get back to basics. Marketing basics, that is.</p>
<p>Marketing &#8211; whether push or pull, traditional or online, outbound or inbound &#8211; is a game of either creating your own buzz, or riding someone else&#8217;s buzz. Creating your own buzz is tough to do, unless you have something new, unique with mass appeal to tell people about, or you can ride on your own reputation built over time. Riding someone else&#8217;s buzz, on the other hand, is quite easy. It&#8217;s popular for those who want a quick spike in their marketing performance and return on investment. It&#8217;s a legitimate marketing technique if done properly.</p>
<p>Here are a few &#8220;riding someone else&#8217;s buzz&#8221; ideas:</p>
<ul>
<li>Associate with well-known or recognizable brand names. It&#8217;s all about attention grabbing, and household names and celebrities give you instant buzz and attention.</li>
<li>Hot topics or stories of the day. By definition these are already hot, so huge attention base already exists. All you have to do is make it relevant to your products, services or situation.</li>
<li>Controversial or outrageous people and stories. These can come from anywhere and take many shapes and forms, but the bottom line is the controversial and the outrageous command free publicity, which also benefit from its natural viral characteristic.</li>
<li>Stealing someone else&#8217;s great content. Even though this works well, it&#8217;s short-lived. Therefore it&#8217;s not recommended, and it&#8217;s against many laws, including the <a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/category/marketing/social-network-marketing/" title='Social Network Marketing'>social networking</a> law.</li>
</ul>
<p>I may be guilty as the next guy who mentions MJ is his post. And maybe I am. But more importantly, if this post can stop a few marketers and help them think about what they do just for a little while, it&#8217;s done its job.</p>
<p>So, no, marketing basics do not start with what you may learn in business schools, from others in the industry, and certainly not by your desire to be successful. They start with you and your integrity.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com">Marketing Autopsy Blog</a><br>
 &#169; 2009 Marketing Autopsy Blog.
<br/><br/><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/marketing-basics-and-building-buzz/">Marketing Basics and Building Buzz &#8211; What About Integrity?</a></p>

	<h4>Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/pointless-babble-is-king-twitter-study-almost-hits-mark/" title="Pointless Babble Is King: Twitter Study Almost Hits the Mark (August 18, 2009)">Pointless Babble Is King: Twitter Study Almost Hits the Mark</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/blogging/corporate-blogging-minimum-must-have-elements-for-successful-strategy/" title="Corporate Blogging &#8211; Minimum Must-Have Elements For Successful Strategy (August 11, 2009)">Corporate Blogging &#8211; Minimum Must-Have Elements For Successful Strategy</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/social-network-marketing/creating-social-media-strategy-include-legal-team/" title="Creating a Social Media Strategy? Don&#8217;t Forget the Legal Team (July 22, 2009)">Creating a Social Media Strategy? Don&#8217;t Forget the Legal Team</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/corporate-marketing/inbound-marketing-blogging-business/" title="How to Build a New Media Corporate Marketing Team (July 8, 2009)">How to Build a New Media Corporate Marketing Team</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/social-media/twitters-achilles-heels-its-biggest-challenge/" title="Twitter&#8217;s Achilles&#8217; Heels May Be Its Biggest Challenge (June 26, 2009)">Twitter&#8217;s Achilles&#8217; Heels May Be Its Biggest Challenge</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/customer-facing/marketing-and-customer-service-is-really-the-same/" title="Marketing and Customer Service Are Really One and the Same to Customers (June 23, 2009)">Marketing and Customer Service Are Really One and the Same to Customers</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/customer-facing/getting-used-by-social-media-marketing/" title="Getting Used by Social Media Marketing? (December 20, 2008)">Getting Used by Social Media Marketing?</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/customer-facing/who-does-not-want-inbound-marketing/" title="Who Doesn&#8217;t Want Inbound Marketing? (December 3, 2008)">Who Doesn&#8217;t Want Inbound Marketing?</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/about-cuong-huynh-marketing-communications/" title="About Cuong Huynh (October 20, 2008)">About Cuong Huynh</a></li>
	<li><a href="http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/about-marketing-autopsy-blog/" title="About Marketing Autopsy (October 20, 2008)">About Marketing Autopsy</a></li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketingautopsyblog.com/marketing/marketing-basics-and-building-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
